The NFST received 1,966 completed responses to its 2025/26 Ticket Consultation between 5 and 9 March 2026. This is the largest supporter consultation exercise the Trust has conducted. The respondent base is overwhelmingly committed: 77% attend 15+ home games per season, 91% of season card holders have held theirs for 5+ years, and 55% attend every single home match.
The findings are unambiguous: supporters view match day tickets as poor value, overwhelmingly oppose any price increase, and — for the first time — affordability has overtaken loyalty as the primary renewal factor.
Season card holders form the majority (58.9%), followed by MyForest members (32.5%). Away members make up 11.2%.
| Category | Count | % | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Season card holder | 1,159 | 58.9% | |
| MyForest member (Pro/Plus/Standard) | 638 | 32.5% | |
| Away member | 220 | 11.2% | |
| MyForest Account (free) | 52 | 2.6% | |
| None of the above | 49 | 2.5% |
Among the 1,300 current holders, tenure is deeply committed: 59.8% have held for 10+ seasons and 30.8% for 5–10. Only 9.3% are relatively new (1–4 seasons).
| Tenure | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| 10+ seasons | 778 | 39.6% |
| 5–10 seasons | 401 | 20.4% |
| 2–4 seasons | 107 | 5.4% |
| 1 season | 14 | 0.7% |
| Not currently a holder | 666 | 33.9% |
Of the 945 active MyForest members, Pro leads (37.3%), followed by Standard (27.7%) and Plus (19.7%).
| Tier | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| Not a member | 1,021 | 51.9% |
| MyForest Pro | 352 | 17.9% |
| MyForest Standard | 262 | 13.3% |
| MyForest Plus | 186 | 9.5% |
| MyForest Account | 135 | 6.9% |
| MyForest International | 10 | 0.5% |
55.5% attend every game and 76.9% attend 15+ per season. Only 5.5% attend fewer than five. These are the people who fill the City Ground week in, week out.
| Frequency | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| Every game | 1,091 | 55.5% |
| 15+ games a season | 422 | 21.5% |
| 10+ games a season | 210 | 10.7% |
| 5+ games a season | 134 | 6.8% |
| Fewer than 5 games | 109 | 5.5% |
Among 1,325 season card holders, sentiment clusters around "Fair" (50.2%) with a significant "Poor" minority (25.2%). Only 3.6% rate value as "Excellent".
| Rating | Count | % of Holders |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 48 | 3.6% |
| Good | 278 | 21.0% |
| Fair | 665 | 50.2% |
| Poor | 334 | 25.2% |
Among current holders (excl. N/A): 65.9% want no increase. Combined with 0–2%, over 83% want prices frozen or inflation-only.
| Option | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| No increase | 939 | 47.8% |
| 0–2% | 234 | 11.9% |
| 2–4% | 182 | 9.3% |
| 5–7% | 38 | 1.9% |
| 7–9% / 10%+ | 5 | 0.3% |
| N/A (no season card) | 568 | 28.9% |
812 comments — the most heavily commented question. Themes are consistent and mutually reinforcing: prices have risen sharply since promotion, relegation uncertainty makes any increase unjustifiable, loyal supporters feel taken for granted, and Europa League pricing is cited as evidence the club has already overreached.
Among 884 active members, the largest single group (35.6%) rate value as "Poor". The 1.87/4 average sits below "Fair".
| Rating | Count | % of Members |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 27 | 3.1% |
| Good | 148 | 16.7% |
| Fair | 394 | 44.6% |
| Poor | 315 | 35.6% |
Among active members (excl. N/A): 76.9% want no increase. Only 10.9% accept 0–2%.
| Option | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| No increase | 792 | 40.3% |
| 0–2% | 108 | 5.5% |
| 2–4% | 83 | 4.2% |
| 5–7% | 23 | 1.2% |
| 7–9% / 10%+ | 10 | 0.5% |
| N/A (no MyForest membership) | 950 | 48.3% |
The most critical metric. All 1,966 respondents answered, and 52.8% — over half — rate match day ticket value as "Poor". The weighted average of 1.58/4 is the lowest score in the survey, sitting between "Poor" and "Fair" but significantly closer to Poor.
| Rating | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 19 | 1.0% |
| Good | 177 | 9.0% |
| Fair | 732 | 37.2% |
| Poor | 1,038 | 52.8% |
The strongest signal: 81.8% of all 1,966 respondents want no increase. Over 91.2% want prices frozen or inflation-only. Support for increases above 5% is negligible (2.1%).
| Option | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| No increase | 1,609 | 81.8% |
| 0–2% | 185 | 9.4% |
| 2–4% | 134 | 6.8% |
| 5–7% | 31 | 1.6% |
| 7–9% / 10%+ | 7 | 0.4% |
Among 664 away members, VFM is 2.40/4 — the highest-rated product, reflecting the genuine value of exclusive access. 77.7% still want no increase.
| Rating | Count | % of Members |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 92 | 13.9% |
| Good | 196 | 29.5% |
| Fair | 261 | 39.3% |
| Poor | 115 | 17.3% |
| Option | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| No increase | 638 | 32.5% |
| 0–2% | 94 | 4.8% |
| 2–4% | 58 | 3.0% |
| 5–7% | 21 | 1.1% |
| 7–9% / 10%+ | 10 | 0.5% |
| N/A (no Away membership) | 1,145 | 58.2% |
Among 973 respondents who answered, 61.3% report ballot success of just 0–10%. Only 2.4% report 75%+.
| Ballot Success Rate | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| 0–10% | 596 | 61.3% |
| 11–25% | 85 | 8.7% |
| 25–49% | 175 | 18.0% |
| 50–74% | 94 | 9.7% |
| 75%+ | 23 | 2.4% |
Satisfaction is low at 2.75/5, with 31.6% dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. The three-tier system divides opinion — "Don't know" leads (38.7%), reflecting low visibility for non-away-members.
| Satisfaction | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| Very satisfied | 128 | 6.5% |
| Satisfied | 211 | 10.7% |
| Neutral | 1,005 | 51.1% |
| Dissatisfied | 291 | 14.8% |
| Very dissatisfied | 331 | 16.8% |
| Is the three-tier system fair? | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| Don't know | 760 | 38.7% |
| Somewhat, could be improved | 543 | 27.6% |
| No, needs major changes | 432 | 22.0% |
| Yes, it works well | 231 | 11.7% |
Only 12.9% will be eligible for concessions. The scheme generates notable opposition — 27.6% disapprove or strongly disapprove — while 50.7% sit in "neither".
| View | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| Strongly approve | 141 | 7.2% |
| Approve | 287 | 14.6% |
| Neither approve nor disapprove | 996 | 50.7% |
| Disapprove | 324 | 16.5% |
| Strongly disapprove | 218 | 11.1% |
Affordability leads at 54.9%, with loyalty at 37.7%. The majority will make an active financial calculation about renewal, not an emotional one.
| Factor | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| Affordability | 1,079 | 54.9% |
| Loyalty | 741 | 37.7% |
| Other | 78 | 4.0% |
| Team performance this season | 68 | 3.5% |
586 respondents — nearly one in three — left final comments. Dominant themes:
Scores worsen from season cards (2.03) to memberships (1.87) to match day tickets (1.58). Away memberships (2.40) are the exception — genuine exclusive access has tangible value. Per-game cost visibility is the primary driver of dissatisfaction.
"No increase" rises in lockstep: season cards 65.9% → MyForest 76.9% → match day 81.8%. The worst-valued products get the strongest pushback.
259 of 792 match day comments (33%) reference European pricing. Unsold seats are observable, real-time evidence of demand destruction — making arguments for further increases untenable.
54.9% cite affordability as the #1 factor vs 37.7% loyalty. When the majority makes financial rather than emotional decisions, the club's traditional safety net of loyalty-driven renewal no longer holds.
37.7% cite loyalty, but open-text reveals this loyalty increasingly feels exploited. Many frame comments as explicit warnings. The club risks a tipping point where accumulated resentment converts loyal renewers into active non-renewers.
1,966 responses with consistent findings across question types, membership categories, and open-text themes. This is not a vocal minority — it is a representative cross-section of the engaged supporter base.
Based on 1,966 responses from across the supporter base, the Trust makes the following evidence-based recommendations:
81.8% oppose any match day increase. 65.9% of season card holders and 76.9% of MyForest members want a freeze. With VFM scores below the midpoint across every product and affordability as the #1 renewal factor, a comprehensive price freeze is the minimum credible response.
Supporters feel it is fundamentally unfair to commit at Premier League prices when the club may be playing Championship football. Renewals should open no earlier than late May 2026.
The current approach has demonstrably failed. Lower prices for non-league fixtures would likely increase total revenue through higher attendance, improved atmosphere, and greater ancillary spend.
The most demanded policy change: 279 youth mentions, 140 references to 18–21, 117 student comments. The pricing cliff directly threatens the club's future fanbase pipeline.
Charging children the same fee as adults (e.g. £99) is widely described as indefensible. A reduced junior rate would ease the burden on families.
61.3% of Priority Two members report single-digit ballot success. The scheme needs structural reform: simplification, attendance-based progression, greater transparency, and investigation of reported reselling.
Hot water, functioning toilets, improved food/drink, and basic hygiene standards are cited so frequently they have become symbolic of the pricing-experience disconnect.
Loyalty discounts for long-serving holders, clearer waiting list communication, better membership benefits, and visible gestures of appreciation would address the growing sense of being taken for granted.